Model Comparison
GPT Image 1.5 vs Midjourney
GPT Image 1.5: HeavyMidjourney: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Midjourney uses 97% more energy per query.
Midjourney uses 97% more energy than GPT Image 1.5
7.5 Wh vs 3.8 Wh per query · 2.3 g vs 1.7 g CO₂ · 14 mL vs 14 mL water
GPT Image 1.5
OpenAI
Energy per query3.8 Wh
CO₂ per query1.7 g
Water per query14 mL
VS
Midjourney
Midjourney
Energy per query7.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.3 g
Water per query14 mL
GPT Image 1.5
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure / Multi-cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Midjourney
ProviderMidjourney
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationGoogle Cloud (US/EU TPU regions)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 97% more energy per query than GPT Image 1.5. GPT Image 1.5 uses 3.8 Wh per query, while Midjourney uses 7.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT Image 1.5 and Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 39% more CO₂ per query than GPT Image 1.5. GPT Image 1.5 emits 1.7 g of CO₂ per query compared to Midjourney's 2.3 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT Image 1.5 or Midjourney?
GPT Image 1.5 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.8 Wh per query compared to Midjourney's 7.5 Wh. That makes Midjourney roughly 2.0x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT Image 1.5 and Midjourney adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute