Model Comparison
DALL-E 3 vs Midjourney
DALL-E 3: HeavyMidjourney: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Midjourney uses 2.5x more energy per query.
Midjourney uses 2.5x more energy than DALL-E 3
7.5 Wh vs 3.0 Wh per query · 2.3 g vs 1.2 g CO₂ · 14 mL vs 11 mL water
DALL-E 3
OpenAI
Energy per query3.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.2 g
Water per query11 mL
VS
Midjourney
Midjourney
Energy per query7.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.3 g
Water per query14 mL
DALL-E 3
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Midjourney
ProviderMidjourney
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationGoogle Cloud (US/EU TPU regions)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DALL-E 3 or Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 2.5x more energy per query than DALL-E 3. DALL-E 3 uses 3.0 Wh per query, while Midjourney uses 7.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DALL-E 3 and Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 92% more CO₂ per query than DALL-E 3. DALL-E 3 emits 1.2 g of CO₂ per query compared to Midjourney's 2.3 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DALL-E 3 or Midjourney?
DALL-E 3 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.0 Wh per query compared to Midjourney's 7.5 Wh. That makes Midjourney roughly 2.5x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DALL-E 3 and Midjourney adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute