Model Comparison
GPT-4o Image Generation vs Midjourney
GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyMidjourney: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Midjourney uses 67% more energy per query.
Midjourney uses 67% more energy than GPT-4o Image Generation
7.5 Wh vs 4.5 Wh per query · 2.3 g vs 2.0 g CO₂ · 14 mL vs 16 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
Midjourney
Midjourney
Energy per query7.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.3 g
Water per query14 mL
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Midjourney
ProviderMidjourney
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationGoogle Cloud (US/EU TPU regions)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 67% more energy per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while Midjourney uses 7.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 15% more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Midjourney's 2.3 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or Midjourney?
GPT-4o Image Generation is the more environmentally friendly option, using 4.5 Wh per query compared to Midjourney's 7.5 Wh. That makes Midjourney roughly 1.7x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and Midjourney adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute