Model Comparison
GPT-4o Mini vs Phi-4 Reasoning
GPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficientPhi-4 Reasoning: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Phi-4 Reasoning uses 12.9x more energy per query.
Phi-4 Reasoning uses 12.9x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
1.8 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.79 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 7 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
VS
Phi-4 Reasoning
Microsoft
Energy per query1.8 Wh
CO₂ per query0.79 g
Water per query7 mL
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Phi-4 Reasoning
ProviderMicrosoft
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / Azure
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Mini or Phi-4 Reasoning?
Phi-4 Reasoning uses 12.9x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh per query, while Phi-4 Reasoning uses 1.8 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Mini and Phi-4 Reasoning?
Phi-4 Reasoning uses 13.2x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini emits 0.06 g of CO₂ per query compared to Phi-4 Reasoning's 0.79 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Mini or Phi-4 Reasoning?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to Phi-4 Reasoning's 1.8 Wh. That makes Phi-4 Reasoning roughly 12.9x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Mini and Phi-4 Reasoning adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute