Model Comparison

GPT-4o Image Generation vs GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient

Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 32.1x more energy per query.

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 32.1x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
4.5 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 0.06 g CO · 16 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL

GPT-4o Image Generation

ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy

GPT-4o Mini

ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient

Frequently Asked Questions

Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or GPT-4o Mini?

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 32.1x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.

What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and GPT-4o Mini?

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 33.3x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.

Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or GPT-4o Mini?

GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 32.1x more energy-intensive.

Calculate your footprint with these models

See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.

Calculate My Compute
View GPT-4o Image Generation detailsView GPT-4o Mini details