Model Comparison
GPT-4o Mini vs Phi-4 Mini
GPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficientPhi-4 Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy than Phi-4 Mini
0.14 Wh vs 0.08 Wh per query · 0.06 g vs 0.03 g CO₂ · 0.50 mL vs 0.30 mL water
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
VS
Phi-4 Mini
Microsoft
Energy per query0.08 Wh
CO₂ per query0.03 g
Water per query0.30 mL
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Phi-4 Mini
ProviderMicrosoft
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / Azure
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Mini or Phi-4 Mini?
GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy per query than Phi-4 Mini. GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh per query, while Phi-4 Mini uses 0.08 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Mini and Phi-4 Mini?
GPT-4o Mini uses 2.0x more CO₂ per query than Phi-4 Mini. GPT-4o Mini emits 0.06 g of CO₂ per query compared to Phi-4 Mini's 0.03 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Mini or Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.08 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.14 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Mini roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Mini and Phi-4 Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute