Model Comparison
GPT-4o Mini vs o3-mini
GPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficiento3-mini: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. o3-mini uses 14.3x more energy per query.
o3-mini uses 14.3x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
2.0 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.90 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 7 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
VS
o3-mini
OpenAI
Energy per query2.0 Wh
CO₂ per query0.90 g
Water per query7 mL
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
o3-mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Mini or o3-mini?
o3-mini uses 14.3x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh per query, while o3-mini uses 2.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Mini and o3-mini?
o3-mini uses 15.0x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini emits 0.06 g of CO₂ per query compared to o3-mini's 0.90 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Mini or o3-mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to o3-mini's 2.0 Wh. That makes o3-mini roughly 14.3x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Mini and o3-mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute