Model Comparison
GPT-4o Mini vs Nemotron 3 Super
GPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficientNemotron 3 Super: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Nemotron 3 Super uses 3.2x more energy per query.
Nemotron 3 Super uses 3.2x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
0.45 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.20 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 2 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
VS
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
Energy per query0.45 Wh
CO₂ per query0.20 g
Water per query2 mL
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderNVIDIA
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / NVIDIA NIM
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Mini or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super uses 3.2x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh per query, while Nemotron 3 Super uses 0.45 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Mini and Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super uses 3.3x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini emits 0.06 g of CO₂ per query compared to Nemotron 3 Super's 0.20 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Mini or Nemotron 3 Super?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to Nemotron 3 Super's 0.45 Wh. That makes Nemotron 3 Super roughly 3.2x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Mini and Nemotron 3 Super adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute