Model Comparison
GPT-4o Mini vs Kimi
GPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficientKimi: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Kimi uses 8.6x more energy per query.
Kimi uses 8.6x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
1.2 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.63 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 4 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
VS
Kimi
Moonshot AI
Energy per query1.2 Wh
CO₂ per query0.63 g
Water per query4 mL
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Kimi
ProviderMoonshot AI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationMoonshot AI Cloud (China)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Mini or Kimi?
Kimi uses 8.6x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh per query, while Kimi uses 1.2 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Mini and Kimi?
Kimi uses 10.5x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GPT-4o Mini emits 0.06 g of CO₂ per query compared to Kimi's 0.63 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Mini or Kimi?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to Kimi's 1.2 Wh. That makes Kimi roughly 8.6x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Mini and Kimi adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute