Model Comparison
GPT-4o Image Generation vs Recraft V4
GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyRecraft V4: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy than Recraft V4
4.5 Wh vs 3.0 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 1.2 g CO₂ · 16 mL vs 6 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
Recraft V4
Recraft
Energy per query3.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.2 g
Water per query6 mL
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Recraft V4
ProviderRecraft
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationCloud (US/EU)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or Recraft V4?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy per query than Recraft V4. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while Recraft V4 uses 3.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and Recraft V4?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 67% more CO₂ per query than Recraft V4. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Recraft V4's 1.2 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or Recraft V4?
Recraft V4 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.0 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 1.5x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and Recraft V4 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute