GPT-4o Image Generation vs o3 (Reasoning)
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. o3 (Reasoning) uses 4.8x more energy per query.
GPT-4o Image Generation
o3 (Reasoning)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or o3 (Reasoning)?
o3 (Reasoning) uses 4.8x more energy per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while o3 (Reasoning) uses 21.4 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and o3 (Reasoning)?
o3 (Reasoning) uses 5.0x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to o3 (Reasoning)'s 10.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or o3 (Reasoning)?
GPT-4o Image Generation is the more environmentally friendly option, using 4.5 Wh per query compared to o3 (Reasoning)'s 21.4 Wh. That makes o3 (Reasoning) roughly 4.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and o3 (Reasoning) adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute