Model Comparison
GPT-4o Image Generation vs Midjourney V7
GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyMidjourney V7: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Midjourney V7 uses 78% more energy per query.
Midjourney V7 uses 78% more energy than GPT-4o Image Generation
8.0 Wh vs 4.5 Wh per query · 2.5 g vs 2.0 g CO₂ · 15 mL vs 16 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
Midjourney V7
Midjourney
Energy per query8.0 Wh
CO₂ per query2.5 g
Water per query15 mL
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Midjourney V7
ProviderMidjourney
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationCloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or Midjourney V7?
Midjourney V7 uses 78% more energy per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while Midjourney V7 uses 8.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and Midjourney V7?
Midjourney V7 uses 25% more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Midjourney V7's 2.5 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or Midjourney V7?
GPT-4o Image Generation is the more environmentally friendly option, using 4.5 Wh per query compared to Midjourney V7's 8.0 Wh. That makes Midjourney V7 roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and Midjourney V7 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute