Model Comparison
GPT-4o Image Generation vs Imagen 3
GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyImagen 3: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy than Imagen 3
4.5 Wh vs 2.5 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 0.33 g CO₂ · 16 mL vs 3 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
Imagen 3
Google
Energy per query2.5 Wh
CO₂ per query0.33 g
Water per query3 mL
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Imagen 3
ProviderGoogle
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or Imagen 3?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy per query than Imagen 3. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while Imagen 3 uses 2.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and Imagen 3?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 6.1x more CO₂ per query than Imagen 3. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Imagen 3's 0.33 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or Imagen 3?
Imagen 3 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 2.5 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and Imagen 3 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute