Model Comparison
DeepSeek-R1 vs GPT-4o Mini
DeepSeek-R1: Very heavyGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. DeepSeek-R1 uses 207.1x more energy per query.
DeepSeek-R1 uses 207.1x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
29.0 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 15.2 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 107 mL vs 0.50 mL water
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
Energy per query29.0 Wh
CO₂ per query15.2 g
Water per query107 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
DeepSeek-R1
ProviderDeepSeek
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationChina (Hangzhou / Hainan)
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierVery heavy
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DeepSeek-R1 or GPT-4o Mini?
DeepSeek-R1 uses 207.1x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. DeepSeek-R1 uses 29.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4o Mini?
DeepSeek-R1 uses 253.3x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. DeepSeek-R1 emits 15.2 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DeepSeek-R1 or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to DeepSeek-R1's 29.0 Wh. That makes DeepSeek-R1 roughly 207.1x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute