Model Comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs GPT-4o Mini
DeepSeek-R1-0528: Very heavyGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 228.6x more energy per query.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 228.6x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
32.0 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 16.8 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 118 mL vs 0.50 mL water
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
Energy per query32.0 Wh
CO₂ per query16.8 g
Water per query118 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
DeepSeek-R1-0528
ProviderDeepSeek
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationDeepSeek Cloud (China)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierVery heavy
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or GPT-4o Mini?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 228.6x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 32.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GPT-4o Mini?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 280.0x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. DeepSeek-R1-0528 emits 16.8 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 32.0 Wh. That makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 roughly 228.6x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute