Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4o Mini
Claude Opus 4.7: HeavyGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Claude Opus 4.7 uses 46.4x more energy per query.
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 46.4x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
6.5 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 2.3 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 12 mL vs 0.50 mL water
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
Energy per query6.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.3 g
Water per query12 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
Claude Opus 4.7
ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS / GCP
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o Mini?
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 46.4x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. Claude Opus 4.7 uses 6.5 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4o Mini?
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 38.0x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. Claude Opus 4.7 emits 2.3 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to Claude Opus 4.7's 6.5 Wh. That makes Claude Opus 4.7 roughly 46.4x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute