Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o Mini
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: StandardGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 19.9x more energy per query.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 19.9x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
2.8 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.97 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 5 mL vs 0.50 mL water
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Energy per query2.8 Wh
CO₂ per query0.97 g
Water per query5 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS US East (Virginia) / US West (Oregon)
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierStandard
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4o Mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 19.9x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 2.8 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o Mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 16.2x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. Claude 3.7 Sonnet emits 0.97 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 2.8 Wh. That makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet roughly 19.9x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute