Model Comparison
Suno v5.5 vs Udio
Suno v5.5: ExtremeUdio: Extreme
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Suno v5.5 uses 14% more energy per query.
Suno v5.5 uses 14% more energy than Udio
80.0 Wh vs 70.0 Wh per query · 32.0 g vs 25.0 g CO₂ · 288 mL vs 130 mL water
Suno v5.5
Suno
Energy per query80.0 Wh
CO₂ per query32.0 g
Water per query288 mL
VS
Udio
Udio
Energy per query70.0 Wh
CO₂ per query25.0 g
Water per query130 mL
Suno v5.5
ProviderSuno
CategoryMusic Generation
Inference LocationCloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Udio
ProviderUdio
CategoryMusic Generation
Inference LocationCloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Suno v5.5 or Udio?
Suno v5.5 uses 14% more energy per query than Udio. Suno v5.5 uses 80.0 Wh per query, while Udio uses 70.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Suno v5.5 and Udio?
Suno v5.5 uses 28% more CO₂ per query than Udio. Suno v5.5 emits 32.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Udio's 25.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Suno v5.5 or Udio?
Udio is the more environmentally friendly option, using 70.0 Wh per query compared to Suno v5.5's 80.0 Wh. That makes Suno v5.5 roughly 1.1x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Suno v5.5 and Udio adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute