Model Comparison
Sora 2 vs Stable Video Diffusion
Sora 2: ExtremeStable Video Diffusion: Extreme
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Sora 2 uses 4.0x more energy per query.
Sora 2 uses 4.0x more energy than Stable Video Diffusion
600.0 Wh vs 150.0 Wh per query · 262.0 g vs 60.0 g CO₂ · 2.16 L vs 280 mL water
Sora 2
OpenAI
Energy per query600.0 Wh
CO₂ per query262.0 g
Water per query2.16 L
VS
Stable Video Diffusion
Stability AI
Energy per query150.0 Wh
CO₂ per query60.0 g
Water per query280 mL
Sora 2
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationAzure / Multi-cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Stable Video Diffusion
ProviderStability AI
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Sora 2 or Stable Video Diffusion?
Sora 2 uses 4.0x more energy per query than Stable Video Diffusion. Sora 2 uses 600.0 Wh per query, while Stable Video Diffusion uses 150.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Sora 2 and Stable Video Diffusion?
Sora 2 uses 4.4x more CO₂ per query than Stable Video Diffusion. Sora 2 emits 262.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Stable Video Diffusion's 60.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Sora 2 or Stable Video Diffusion?
Stable Video Diffusion is the more environmentally friendly option, using 150.0 Wh per query compared to Sora 2's 600.0 Wh. That makes Sora 2 roughly 4.0x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Sora 2 and Stable Video Diffusion adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute