Model Comparison

NotebookLM Audio Overview vs Whisper

NotebookLM Audio Overview: Very heavyWhisper: Standard

Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. NotebookLM Audio Overview uses 30.0x more energy per query.

NotebookLM Audio Overview uses 30.0x more energy than Whisper
15.0 Wh vs 0.50 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 0.22 g CO · 16 mL vs 2 mL water
NotebookLM Audio Overview
Google
Energy per query15.0 Wh
CO per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
Whisper
OpenAI
Energy per query0.50 Wh
CO per query0.22 g
Water per query2 mL

NotebookLM Audio Overview

ProviderGoogle
CategoryAudio
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierVery heavy

Whisper

ProviderOpenAI
CategoryAudio
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies) / Azure
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard

Frequently Asked Questions

Which uses more energy, NotebookLM Audio Overview or Whisper?

NotebookLM Audio Overview uses 30.0x more energy per query than Whisper. NotebookLM Audio Overview uses 15.0 Wh per query, while Whisper uses 0.50 Wh.

What is the carbon footprint difference between NotebookLM Audio Overview and Whisper?

NotebookLM Audio Overview uses 9.1x more CO₂ per query than Whisper. NotebookLM Audio Overview emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Whisper's 0.22 g.

Which is more environmentally friendly, NotebookLM Audio Overview or Whisper?

Whisper is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.50 Wh per query compared to NotebookLM Audio Overview's 15.0 Wh. That makes NotebookLM Audio Overview roughly 30.0x more energy-intensive.

Calculate your footprint with these models

See how your daily usage of NotebookLM Audio Overview and Whisper adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.

Calculate My Compute
View NotebookLM Audio Overview detailsView Whisper details