Model Comparison
Gemini Nano vs GPT-4o
Gemini Nano: Ultra-efficientGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o uses 28.7x more energy per query.
GPT-4o uses 28.7x more energy than Gemini Nano
0.43 Wh vs 0.01 Wh per query · 0.19 g vs 0.00 g CO₂ · 2 mL vs 0.00 mL water
Gemini Nano
Google
Energy per query0.01 Wh
CO₂ per query0.00 g
Water per query0.00 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
Gemini Nano
ProviderGoogle
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationOn-device (Pixel, Samsung, Chrome)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Gemini Nano or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o uses 28.7x more energy per query than Gemini Nano. Gemini Nano uses 0.01 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Gemini Nano and GPT-4o?
GPT-4o uses 63.3x more CO₂ per query than Gemini Nano. Gemini Nano emits 0.00 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Gemini Nano or GPT-4o?
Gemini Nano is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.01 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.43 Wh. That makes GPT-4o roughly 28.7x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Gemini Nano and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute