Model Comparison
Devin vs GPT-5.2 Codex
Devin: HeavyGPT-5.2 Codex: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-5.2 Codex uses 33% more energy per query.
GPT-5.2 Codex uses 33% more energy than Devin
4.0 Wh vs 3.0 Wh per query · 1.7 g vs 1.3 g CO₂ · 15 mL vs 11 mL water
Devin
Cognition AI
Energy per query3.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.3 g
Water per query11 mL
VS
GPT-5.2 Codex
OpenAI
Energy per query4.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.7 g
Water per query15 mL
Devin
ProviderCognition AI
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationCloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationAzure / Multi-cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Devin or GPT-5.2 Codex?
GPT-5.2 Codex uses 33% more energy per query than Devin. Devin uses 3.0 Wh per query, while GPT-5.2 Codex uses 4.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Devin and GPT-5.2 Codex?
GPT-5.2 Codex uses 33% more CO₂ per query than Devin. Devin emits 1.3 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-5.2 Codex's 1.7 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Devin or GPT-5.2 Codex?
Devin is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.0 Wh per query compared to GPT-5.2 Codex's 4.0 Wh. That makes GPT-5.2 Codex roughly 1.3x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Devin and GPT-5.2 Codex adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute