Model Comparison
DeepSeek-V3 vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek-V3: StandardGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. DeepSeek-V3 uses 4.7x more energy per query.
DeepSeek-V3 uses 4.7x more energy than GPT-4o
2.0 Wh vs 0.43 Wh per query · 1.1 g vs 0.19 g CO₂ · 7 mL vs 2 mL water
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
Energy per query2.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.1 g
Water per query7 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
DeepSeek-V3
ProviderDeepSeek
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationChina (Hangzhou / Hainan)
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierStandard
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-V3 uses 4.7x more energy per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-V3 uses 2.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-V3 uses 5.5x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-V3 emits 1.1 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.43 Wh per query compared to DeepSeek-V3's 2.0 Wh. That makes DeepSeek-V3 roughly 4.7x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute