Model Comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek-R1-0528: Very heavyGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 74.4x more energy per query.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 74.4x more energy than GPT-4o
32.0 Wh vs 0.43 Wh per query · 16.8 g vs 0.19 g CO₂ · 118 mL vs 2 mL water
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
Energy per query32.0 Wh
CO₂ per query16.8 g
Water per query118 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
DeepSeek-R1-0528
ProviderDeepSeek
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationDeepSeek Cloud (China)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierVery heavy
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 74.4x more energy per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 32.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses 88.4x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-R1-0528 emits 16.8 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.43 Wh per query compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 32.0 Wh. That makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 roughly 74.4x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute