Model Comparison
Windsurf (Codeium) vs GitHub Copilot
Windsurf (Codeium): StandardGitHub Copilot: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GitHub Copilot uses 88% more energy per query.
GitHub Copilot uses 88% more energy than Windsurf (Codeium)
1.5 Wh vs 0.80 Wh per query · 0.66 g vs 0.35 g CO₂ · 5 mL vs 3 mL water
Windsurf (Codeium)
Codeium
Energy per query0.80 Wh
CO₂ per query0.35 g
Water per query3 mL
VS
GitHub Copilot
GitHub / OpenAI
Energy per query1.5 Wh
CO₂ per query0.66 g
Water per query5 mL
Windsurf (Codeium)
ProviderCodeium
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationCloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
GitHub Copilot
ProviderGitHub / OpenAI
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationAzure US (primarily East)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Windsurf (Codeium) or GitHub Copilot?
GitHub Copilot uses 88% more energy per query than Windsurf (Codeium). Windsurf (Codeium) uses 0.80 Wh per query, while GitHub Copilot uses 1.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Windsurf (Codeium) and GitHub Copilot?
GitHub Copilot uses 89% more CO₂ per query than Windsurf (Codeium). Windsurf (Codeium) emits 0.35 g of CO₂ per query compared to GitHub Copilot's 0.66 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Windsurf (Codeium) or GitHub Copilot?
Windsurf (Codeium) is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.80 Wh per query compared to GitHub Copilot's 1.5 Wh. That makes GitHub Copilot roughly 1.9x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Windsurf (Codeium) and GitHub Copilot adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute