Model Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5: StandardGemini 3 Pro: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 2.4x more energy per query.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 2.4x more energy than Gemini 3 Pro
2.6 Wh vs 1.1 Wh per query · 0.91 g vs 0.14 g CO₂ · 5 mL vs 1 mL water
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
Energy per query2.6 Wh
CO₂ per query0.91 g
Water per query5 mL
VS
Gemini 3 Pro
Google
Energy per query1.1 Wh
CO₂ per query0.14 g
Water per query1 mL
Claude Sonnet 4.5
ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS / GCP
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Gemini 3 Pro
ProviderGoogle
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 2.4x more energy per query than Gemini 3 Pro. Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 2.6 Wh per query, while Gemini 3 Pro uses 1.1 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 6.5x more CO₂ per query than Gemini 3 Pro. Claude Sonnet 4.5 emits 0.91 g of CO₂ per query compared to Gemini 3 Pro's 0.14 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Gemini 3 Pro is the more environmentally friendly option, using 1.1 Wh per query compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 2.6 Wh. That makes Claude Sonnet 4.5 roughly 2.4x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute