Model Comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o
Claude 3 Opus: HeavyGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Claude 3 Opus uses 11.6x more energy per query.
Claude 3 Opus uses 11.6x more energy than GPT-4o
5.0 Wh vs 0.43 Wh per query · 1.8 g vs 0.19 g CO₂ · 9 mL vs 2 mL water
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Energy per query5.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.8 g
Water per query9 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
Claude 3 Opus
ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS US East / GCP
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4o?
Claude 3 Opus uses 11.6x more energy per query than GPT-4o. Claude 3 Opus uses 5.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o?
Claude 3 Opus uses 9.2x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o. Claude 3 Opus emits 1.8 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.43 Wh per query compared to Claude 3 Opus's 5.0 Wh. That makes Claude 3 Opus roughly 11.6x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute